Skip to content

November 5, 2026 / Issue 81 / 4 min read

US voters rejected data centers in 40 of 41 local ballot measures on Tuesday. If your AI plan assumes cheap compute arriving on time, price in the delay

The daily briefing video for this issue, 5:12.
Subscribe on YouTube for a daily briefing video(opens in a new tab)

On Tuesday, voters in 10 US states decided 41 local ballot measures about data centers. According to Ballotpedia and results gathered by CNBC(opens in a new tab), they sided against the data centers in every one except a measure in Harwood, North Dakota. Ohio alone had 21 of them. In the same election, Democrats who campaigned on pausing or regulating new data center projects won key races in Ohio, Wisconsin, Georgia and Texas. In a CNBC voter poll(opens in a new tab), 56% of voters said data centers were a crucial or major factor in their decision.

This matters to anyone with an AI budget because almost all the AI you buy runs in someone else's data center, and the model makers' plans assume new capacity gets built on schedule. Local votes decide the zoning, power hookups and tax breaks that set that schedule. OpenAI has secured 8 gigawatts of computing capacity at the PORTS-Pike campus in Ohio, which CNBC calls(opens in a new tab) the largest planned AI data center campus in the world. It is due to come online in phases from 2028. Ohio just elected a governor, Amy Acton, who backs a conditional moratorium on data centers.

The industry has started paying to keep building. On Thursday OpenAI published commitments(opens in a new tab) for the data centers it owns and operates: no NDAs with public officials and published construction plans. It also restated its promise to pay the full cost of powering its data centers. CNBC reports Meta, Microsoft, Google and Anthropic have outlined similar commitments. Paying the whole power bill instead of passing part of it to local households is a real cost, and costs like that end up in the price of compute. Investors read it the same way: on Thursday morning AMD fell about 13% and Nvidia about 7%(opens in a new tab) as traders priced in a tougher policy backdrop, even though AMD's latest quarterly revenue was up 44.7% on a year earlier.

Read the limits. These were local votes, mostly about power, water and tax breaks, not a national verdict on AI. The new Congress does not sit until January, and no federal rule changed this week. What did change is the risk on the supply side: when the compute your plans assume will exist, and what it will cost when it does.

For the CAIO and CFO. Ask your cloud and model vendors which of the capacity behind your 2027 AI commitments still depends on local permits or new power deals, and model a case where it arrives a year late or at a higher price.

Action items

US voters rejected data centers in 40 of 41 local ballot measures on Tuesday, and OpenAI responded by restating its promise to pay the full power cost of its data centers. No federal rule changed, but the timing and price of new AI compute just became less certain.

For the CAIO and CFO

Ask your cloud and model vendors which of the capacity behind your 2027 AI commitments still depends on local permits or new power deals, and model a case where it arrives a year late or at a higher price.

Researched and drafted by an automated workflow, then reviewed and edited by a human editor before publication. Every source is linked. See how we use AI here.

Also worth knowing